Are Democrats and Republicans on the Road to Genocide?

Dr Franklin H Littell was an American scholar who spent ten years working on deNazification projects in Germany and dedicated his life to Holocaust and Genocide studies. He has witnessed at first hand the effects of genocide, and has extensively studied the sociological happenings that create the proper political environment for genocide to occur. In 1988 he published an article titled Early Warning, focused on identifying political movements with genocidal intent before it's too late. Included in this article is a list of 15 criteria of events or attributes of a political movement that imply a future genocide, and he says that if any one party portrays 10-11 of these criteria, “it's time for the alarm bells to start ringing.”

Additionally, the Encyclopedia of Genocide, edited by Israel W Charny, cites the same article with an additional 16^th criteria, and states that a pattern of only 8 to 10 attributes “should be enough to start red flags waving.”

Well, what if I told you both the Democratic and Republican parties of America meet precisely 8 of them, with a ninth occurring naturally in the country?

I might as well be writing a blog about how not to be popular with Americans.

Anti-Terrorism, a Message of Postulation

War has been ever present throughout most all of human history. The first pantheons of human religion typically contained some god of war, or at least a god with a strong hand in war, if not more than one. It has for so long been matter-of-fact that only just recently has war come under attack as unnecessary for human development. What changed was not just our nature, but our technology. (Sociologist James Henslin writes in his textbook Sociology, that human culture is directly based off the society's available technology.) With the globalization of the world, our interconnected network of world-wide communication via the internet, and enough physical means to develop the ideologies of tolerance and acceptance, we have had the exposure needed to realize that most humans are alike. Prejudice and racism and all their facets and dogma (historically common sources of justification for wars against other countries) have, in at least the first world and much, much of the third world, become wide spread symbols of evil. We can no longer use a people's nationality as a sole justification for war, many of us at least, as racism still prevails in all countries to such extent, America by no means an exception. The insightful of humans need an ethical justification, true reason, one clear to a reasonable being; as it should be.

The side effects of such a shift in culture have become evident by a few things: the UN and international community uses several peaceful means to deter acts of war, the most common of which is economic sanctioning, hence you don't see too much "Made in North Korea" at the store, although it's still there. Also, after the World Wars, war has never looked too pretty. There was a day where heroes, in the age of sword and bow, would go out, get beat up, and have a decent chance of suffering only survivable wounds, from which they could heal and go out again. When we added the additive of high powered explosives and poisonous chemical agents, and guns that can kill hundreds of men before running out of ammo... Well, I need not cite the world's sufferings from this era.

We realize war is bad. But we, humans, are far from eliminating it, in a sense at least.